Today in the headlines of CNN, the FDA is trying to calm the nerves of the American public by suggesting that low level exposure to the chemical BPA (Bisphenol A) is OK. In spite of a rather large study, suggesting a link from chemical exposure to cardiovascular disease and diabetes, the FDA still maintains that BPA is safe. As if to support their position, the American Chemistry Council, an industry trade group, said the study is flawed, has substantial limitations and proves nothing. Can you say conflict of interest? Of course they are going to say this. What many people believe is that the exposure to BPA can be limited by eliminating the act of drinking from those lovely Nalgene water bottles. What they might be unaware of is that BPA is one of the world’s highest production–volume chemicals, with more than 2 million metric tons produced worldwide in 2003 and annual increase in demand of 6% to 10% annually. Bisphenol A is used extensively in epoxy resins lining food and beverage containers and as a monomer in polycarbonate plastics in many consumer products. Widespread and continuous exposure to BPA, primarily through food but also through drinking water, dental sealants, dermal exposure, and inhalation of household dusts, is evident from the presence of detectable levels of BPA in more than 90% of the US population. Still not alarmed?

In parts of the world there are large identifiable concentrations of BPA and other chemical compounds being found in tributaries, which is a reason to show some concern. It is possible that exposure to chemical pollutants is far more reaching and more dire in consequences than the news is reporting?

In the Netherlands a study on pregnant women showed an alarming level of these pollutants, from which they suggested more study needed to be done. In the laboratory, BPA has been shown to be cytotoxic. Could it be that this is a bad thing for a developing fetus?

A study at the Yale University School of Medicine was performed on primates which should register some alarm. This study was the first to demonstrate an adverse effect of BPA on the brain in a nonhuman primate model and further amplifies concern about the widespread use of BPA in medical equipment, food preparation, and storage.

The United States is not the only country concerned with this topic. There have been studies from around the world all demonstrating some type of concern with the exposure to this chemical, and yet our own FDA suggests that, again, it’s no big deal. It is a big deal, and we need to be aware of this and do something about it. Through 2004, there have been over 100 articles in scientific literature that have explored the effects of BPA at or below the dose the FDA considers safe. 90% of those reported adverse from their findings.

We, as a community, need to take part in ridding ourselves of these harmful chemicals as best we can. Start with avoiding the use of plastics when at all possible. Eat as little processed or canned foods as you can. Detox your body by eating organic, fresh fruits and vegetables, legumes and beans, nuts and seeds. Start cooking with spices known to have healing properties like turmeric, cinnamon, cumin, and many others. Strength train and recreate responsibly. Avoid stress and take a whole food vitamin supplement instead of a chemical one.

There is much work to be done if we are to reverse 100 years of chemical influence. Start with pointing others to sources of information that may be of some help. Teach our children to avoid the dangers of products that cause health challenges. Change will happen.